Bug 589468 – [abrt] crash in evolution-2.28.3-1.fc12: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

Bug 589468 - [abrt] crash in evolution-2.28.3-1.fc12: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

Summary:	[abrt] crash in evolution-2.28.3-1.fc12: Process /usr/bin/evolution was kille...

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 556939

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	evolution (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	12
Hardware:	x86_64 Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Matthew Barnes
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:	abrt_hash:c81eb7ade8ad18421bbcb114c1d...
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2010-05-06 04:55 EDT by Dundee
Modified:	2010-05-25 06:03 EDT (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-05-25 06:03:04 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (65.69 KB, text/plain) 2010-05-06 04:55 EDT, Dundee	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Dundee 2010-05-06 04:55:11 EDT

abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: evolution
component: evolution
executable: /usr/bin/evolution
global_uuid: c81eb7ade8ad18421bbcb114c1da0abac55e7146
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.x86_64
package: evolution-2.28.3-1.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

How to reproduce
-----
1.Click on button to compose new mail
2.
3.

Comment 1 Dundee 2010-05-06 04:55:15 EDT

Created attachment 411880 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 06:03:04 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 556939 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 06:03:04 EDT

This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #556939.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.