Bug 589617 - Review Request: apache-commons-discovery - rename of jakarta-commons-discovery
Review Request: apache-commons-discovery - rename of jakarta-commons-discovery
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Alexander Kurtakov
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On: 589168
Blocks: JakartaCommonsRename
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2010-05-06 10:58 EDT by Stanislav Ochotnicky
Modified: 2014-01-17 11:03 EST (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-05-11 03:36:08 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
akurtako: fedora‑review+
limburgher: fedora‑cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Stanislav Ochotnicky 2010-05-06 10:58:12 EDT
Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-discovery.spec
SRPM URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-discovery-0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm

Description: Package was renamed from jakarta-commons-discovery. Discovery provides facilities for finding and instantiating classes, and for lifecycle management of singleton (factory) classes.
Comment 1 Stanislav Ochotnicky 2010-05-06 11:07:09 EDT
Adding bug #589168 as blocker because this package contains Requires on apache-commons-logging.
Comment 2 Stanislav Ochotnicky 2010-05-07 05:56:26 EDT
Fixed provides to not self-deprecate self.

Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-discovery.spec

Also any reviewer should note that this is a re-review of existing package named jakarta-commons-discovery.
Comment 3 Peter Lemenkov 2010-05-07 06:02:07 EDT
*-javadoc subpackage must require owner of %{_javadocdir}, e.g. jpackage-utils. Also, I dont think that you should mark %{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version} and %{_javadocdir}/%{name} as %dir explicitly.
Comment 4 Stanislav Ochotnicky 2010-05-07 08:05:53 EDT
Thanks for comments.

> -javadoc subpackage must require owner of %{_javadocdir}, e.g. jpackage-utils.

I fixed this but I will wait a bit before creating another revision in case something else comes up. I also noticed your question about javadoc requires on their parents on fedora-devel. Once that will be cleared up I will create new version of spec/srpm.

> Also, I dont think that you should mark %{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version} and
> %{_javadocdir}/%{name} as %dir explicitly.

I am sorry, but as far as I see I named them using %doc not %dir. Is this wrong? I was told %doc is optional in this case but it will not hurt anything.
Comment 5 Peter Lemenkov 2010-05-08 03:35:46 EDT
(In reply to comment #4)

> I am sorry, but as far as I see I named them using %doc not %dir. Is this
> wrong? I was told %doc is optional in this case but it will not hurt anything.    

You're right - I was wrong here, so, please, disregard this particular objection.
Comment 6 Alexander Kurtakov 2010-05-10 07:28:04 EDT
I'm taking this one.
Comment 7 Alexander Kurtakov 2010-05-10 08:35:49 EDT

OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. OUTPUT:

apache-commons-discovery.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Pluggable -> Plug gable, Plug-gable, Plugged
apache-commons-discovery.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lifecycle -> life cycle, life-cycle, lifestyle

Not a problem. 

OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. 
OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. 
OK: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. 
OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of
those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. 
OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. 
OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. 
OK: Each package must consistently use macros.
OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. 
OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. Javadocs
OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application. 
OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. 
OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. 
OK: Package is correctly Obsoleting/Providing the package it's replacing.

You don't need the %global section free line - it's of no use.

This package is APPROVED.
Comment 8 Alexander Kurtakov 2010-05-10 08:36:43 EDT
P.S. Please make the changes asked from Peter. I assumed them for fixed.
Comment 10 Stanislav Ochotnicky 2010-05-10 09:03:20 EDT
Thanks. Requesting CVS:

New Package CVS Request
Package Name: apache-commons-discovery
Short Description: Apache Commons Discovery
Owners: sochotni
Comment 11 Kevin Fenzi 2010-05-11 00:44:51 EDT
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

Remember to assign the review to the reviewer.
Comment 12 Stanislav Ochotnicky 2010-05-11 03:36:08 EDT
Package build finished in koji. Closing. Thanks all
Comment 13 Lubomir Rintel 2014-01-17 10:58:51 EST
Package Change Request
Package Name: apache-commons-discovery
New Branches: epel7
Owners: lkundrak

Requesting an EPEL branch, maintainer agrees to this and is not willing to maintain the branch himself.
Comment 14 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-01-17 11:03:25 EST
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.