Bug 589987 – [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12: g_hash_table_lookup_node: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 8 (SIGFPE)

Bug 589987 - [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12: g_hash_table_lookup_node: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 8 (SIGFPE)

Summary:	[abrt] crash in nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12: g_hash_table_lookup_node: Process /us...

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 581361

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	nautilus (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	12
Hardware:	x86_64 Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Tomáš Bžatek
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:	abrt_hash:4e0d65254bac94b0079aed30f7b...
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2010-05-07 09:06 EDT by aten
Modified:	2015-03-03 17:47 EST (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-05-25 05:24:49 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (31.21 KB, text/plain) 2010-05-07 09:06 EDT, aten	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description aten 2010-05-07 09:06:28 EDT

abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: nautilus --no-desktop
component: nautilus
crash_function: g_hash_table_lookup_node
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus
global_uuid: 4e0d65254bac94b0079aed30f7b081941082530b
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.x86_64
package: nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 8 (SIGFPE)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

Comment 1 aten 2010-05-07 09:06:29 EDT

Created attachment 412348 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:24:49 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 581361 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:24:49 EDT

This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #581361.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.