Bug 590003 - [abrt] crash in gvfs-smb-1.4.3-7.fc12: g_vfs_job_emit_finished: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-smb was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in gvfs-smb-1.4.3-7.fc12: g_vfs_job_emit_finished: Process /usr/...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 557577
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gvfs
Version: 12
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tomáš Bžatek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:dba7df572880f4630f11e66a970...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-07 13:39 UTC by Jesse Kahtava
Modified: 2015-03-03 22:47 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 10:03:59 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (11.10 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-07 13:39 UTC, Jesse Kahtava 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Jesse Kahtava 2010-05-07 13:39:36 UTC 
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-smb --spawner :1.7 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/11
component: gvfs
crash_function: g_vfs_job_emit_finished
executable: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-smb
global_uuid: dba7df572880f4630f11e66a970e9bc6fe1a5738
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99_1.cubbi_tuxonice.fc12.x86_64
package: gvfs-smb-1.4.3-7.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-smb was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

How to reproduce
-----
1. Mounted a SMB share using nautilus
2. Opened a video from that share using totem
3. Seeked forward through the video a bunch until gvfs-smb crashed
Comment 1 Jesse Kahtava 2010-05-07 13:39:38 UTC 
Created attachment 412355 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 10:03:59 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 557577 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 10:03:59 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #557577.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.