Bug 590398 - [abrt] crash in evolution-2.28.3-1.fc12: boxed_nodes_cmp: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in evolution-2.28.3-1.fc12: boxed_nodes_cmp: Process /usr/bin/ev...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 573846
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution
Version: 12
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:4aca809aa5bc2b89bb968c486a9...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-09 10:37 UTC by James W. Melody
Modified: 2010-05-25 08:23 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 08:23:00 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (57.89 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-09 10:38 UTC, James W. Melody
no flags Details

Description James W. Melody 2010-05-09 10:37:58 UTC
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: evolution
comment: I inadvertantly deleted my addressbook (sync'ing with multisync), and I was trying to restore from a filesystem backup by copying the backed-up addressbook.db into .evolution/addressbook/local/system.  After copying the file into the directory (which I did after evolution --force-shutdown), evolution crashed upon restart.
component: evolution
crash_function: boxed_nodes_cmp
executable: /usr/bin/evolution
global_uuid: 4aca809aa5bc2b89bb968c486a9f915b04078d4d
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.x86_64
package: evolution-2.28.3-1.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

Comment 1 James W. Melody 2010-05-09 10:38:00 UTC
Created attachment 412624 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 08:23:00 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 573846 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 08:23:00 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #573846.

Sorry for the inconvenience.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.