Bug 590488 – [abrt] crash in brasero-2.28.3-1.fc12: raise: Process /usr/bin/brasero was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

Bug 590488 - [abrt] crash in brasero-2.28.3-1.fc12: raise: Process /usr/bin/brasero was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

Summary:	[abrt] crash in brasero-2.28.3-1.fc12: raise: Process /usr/bin/brasero was ki...

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 538722

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	brasero (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	12
Hardware:	i686 Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Xavier Lamien
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:	abrt_hash:9c60304e007f999a0aa252cc569...
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2010-05-09 15:55 EDT by Jazbo
Modified:	2010-05-25 04:41 EDT (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-05-25 04:41:31 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (70.77 KB, text/plain) 2010-05-09 15:55 EDT, Jazbo	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Jazbo 2010-05-09 15:55:13 EDT

abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: brasero
component: brasero
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/bin/brasero
global_uuid: 9c60304e007f999a0aa252cc569d4ffbbbf5c81c
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.i686.PAE
package: brasero-2.28.3-1.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/brasero was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

Comment 1 Jazbo 2010-05-09 15:55:15 EDT

Created attachment 412671 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 04:41:31 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 538722 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 04:41:31 EDT

This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #538722.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.