RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 590683 - Missing dependency on DevKit-disks
Summary: Missing dependency on DevKit-disks
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: bltk
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jiri Skala
QA Contact: desktop-bugs@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-10 13:27 UTC by Radek Vokál
Modified: 2014-11-09 22:32 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: bltk-1.0.9-12.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-10 19:56:56 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Radek Vokál 2010-05-10 13:27:58 UTC 
Description of problem:
bltk -I should require DeviceKit-disks

it reports 

/usr/lib/bltk/bin/bltk_get_hdparm: line 64: /usr/bin/devkit-disks: No such file or directory


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bltk-1.0.9-9.el6.i686
Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2010-05-10 14:32:02 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux major release.  Product Management has requested further
review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Major release.  This request is not yet committed for
inclusion.
Comment 4 Jiri Koten 2010-05-25 16:11:39 UTC 
NOT fixed in bltk-1.0.9-11.el6.x86_64

$ bltk -I
...
/usr/lib64/bltk/bin/bltk_get_hdparm: line 64: /usr/bin/devkit-disks: No such file or directory
grep: /home/test/.bltk/tmp/dev_info: No such file or directory
grep: /home/test/.bltk/tmp/dev_info: No such file or directory

DeviceKit-disks was replaced by udisks but there is no devkit-disks command in this package.
Comment 5 Jiri Skala 2010-05-26 07:59:43 UTC 
This is due to removing symlink 'devkit-disks' from udisks package in RHEL6. Fedora contains this symlink all the time. Therefore I'd like to ask for the reason removing mentioned symlink.

David why was the symlink removed while Fedora contains it?
Comment 6 Matthias Clasen 2010-05-27 13:09:18 UTC 
The symlink was removed because the package was renamed to udisks, and the binaries were renamed along with it. It was removed in RHEL first, because we don't want to be stuck with it for 7+ years here, but it will be going away in Fedora soon, too.

Please change your script to use /usr/bin/udisks directly
Comment 8 Jiri Koten 2010-06-01 16:00:15 UTC 
Bug fix verified with bltk-1.0.9-12.el6.
Comment 9 releng-rhel@redhat.com 2010-11-10 19:56:56 UTC 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.0 is now available and should resolve
the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed
with a resolution of CURRENTRELEASE. You may reopen this bug report if the
solution does not work for you.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.