RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 590698 - ABRT not recognizing previously reported bugs
Summary: ABRT not recognizing previously reported bugs
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: abrt
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Karel Klíč
QA Contact: BaseOS QE - Apps
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-10 14:03 UTC by Issue Tracker
Modified: 2018-11-14 19:32 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version: abrt-1.1.7-1.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-15 13:50:55 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
the requested directories. (766.75 KB, application/x-gzip)
2010-05-10 15:41 UTC, Ben Woodard 		no flags Details
A patch (749 bytes, patch)
2010-06-17 17:00 UTC, Karel Klíč 		no flags Details | Diff
View All

Description Issue Tracker 2010-05-10 14:03:22 UTC 
Escalated to Bugzilla from IssueTracker
Comment 1 Issue Tracker 2010-05-10 14:03:24 UTC 
Event posted on 05-10-2010 09:22am EDT by woodard

Description of problem:
For whatever reason ABRT is sometimes merging failures but other times not. 589298 is the same as 590674 690678 they aren't being merged in the abrt user interface and consequently the crash count doesn't increment.

Another example is: 589615 589752 and a I have a few more of that same one.

How reproducible:
sometimes

Steps to Reproduce:

Actual results:
some of the time it merges issues, sometimes it doesn't

Expected results:
it merges similar issues

This event sent from IssueTracker by kbaxley  [LLNL (HPC)]
 issue 867753
Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2010-05-10 14:32:26 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux major release.  Product Management has requested further
review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Major release.  This request is not yet committed for
inclusion.
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-10 14:38:01 UTC 
hdparm bugs:
589258, 588686 - reported by abrt-1.0.9 using older duplication-detection code which does no work well for those attached backtraces

590649, 590674, 590678 - real problem, needs investigation; abrt-backtrace utility parses the backtraces properly, and provides identical input for hash computation
Comment 4 Karel Klíč 2010-05-10 15:05:42 UTC 
Ben, can you please attach abrt crash dump directories for #590674 and #590678? 

They are located in /var/cache/abrt/ccpp-*. The crashes can be recognized by checking file `component` in the directory, it contains "hdparm".
Comment 5 RHEL Program Management 2010-05-10 15:41:01 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux major release.  Product Management has requested further
review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Major release.  This request is not yet committed for
inclusion.
Comment 6 Ben Woodard 2010-05-10 15:41:34 UTC 
Created attachment 412883 [details]
the requested directories.
Comment 7 Karel Klíč 2010-06-17 17:00:24 UTC 
Created attachment 424882 [details]
A patch
Comment 11 releng-rhel@redhat.com 2010-11-15 13:50:55 UTC 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.0 is now available and should resolve
the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed
with a resolution of CURRENTRELEASE. You may reopen this bug report if the
solution does not work for you.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.