Bug 591474 - [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
[abrt] crash in nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed ...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 572734
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: nautilus (Show other bugs)
12
x86_64 Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Tomáš Bžatek
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
abrt_hash:0e43242774c12ae4d2e129104dd...
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-05-12 07:00 EDT by filadel
Modified: 2015-03-03 17:48 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 05:34:52 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (45.22 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-12 07:00 EDT, filadel
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description filadel 2010-05-12 07:00:24 EDT
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: nautilus
component: nautilus
crash_function: nautilus_file_peek_display_name
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus
global_uuid: 0e43242774c12ae4d2e129104dd2e469fc666290
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.x86_64
package: nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

How to reproduce
-----
1. connect camera on usb port then browse camera with nautilus
2. browse local disk in other nautilus instance
3. start copying pictures from camera to local disk
4. nautilus crashes, copy process aborted
Comment 1 filadel 2010-05-12 07:00:27 EDT
Created attachment 413394 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:34:52 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 572734 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:34:52 EDT
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #572734.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.