Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 59201

Summary:	Broken Requires in RPM/SRPM
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	greg
Component:	sendmail	Assignee:	Florian La Roche <laroche>
Status:	CLOSED WORKSFORME	QA Contact:	Aaron Brown <abrown>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6.2	CC:	greg
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2002-02-18 20:57:27 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description greg 2002-02-02 00:15:32 UTC

Description of Problem: Package looks for sendmail by packagename, should look 
for an MTA, suggest looking for the sendmail command so MTA's like Postfix will 
not break an install/build.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How Reproducible: Every time


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install or build on a system with Postfix as the MTA
2. 
3. 

Actual Results: No install or build, req. --nodeps to install/build


Expected Results: Just instal after MTA found


Additional Information: Also atd script broken as per open bug.

Comment 1 Bishop Clark 2002-02-07 07:37:38 UTC

Is postfix even officially supported by RH62?  If not, this thing will die in
'business case determination'

However, were Greg to drop a patch for the spec, and if the testing was trivial...

(my 2c, perhaps biased because PF loses mail daily at my work)

 - bish
  Cynic.

Comment 2 Eido Inoue 2002-02-18 20:48:43 UTC

re-assigning to the sendmail component

Comment 3 Florian La Roche 2002-02-18 20:57:22 UTC

What rpm was this reported against? Seems not be be something I can fix
witin sendmail, right?

Thanks,

Florian La Roche

Comment 4 Florian La Roche 2002-03-09 13:09:23 UTC

Please reopen with more information if you still think something is wrong
with the sendmail rpm.

Thanks,

Florian La Roche