The following was filed automatically by anaconda: anaconda 12.46 exception report Traceback (most recent call first): File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/sqlutils.py", line 168, in executeSQLQmark return cursor.execute(query, params) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/history.py", line 332, in trans_data_pid_beg VALUES (?, ?, ?)""", (self._tid, pid, state)) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/history.py", line 364, in beg self.trans_data_pid_beg(pid, state) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 1070, in runTransaction self.history.beg(rpmdbv, using_pkgs, list(self.tsInfo)) File "/usr/lib/anaconda/yuminstall.py", line 881, in _run self.runTransaction(cb=cb) File "/usr/lib/anaconda/yuminstall.py", line 863, in run if self._run(instLog, cb, intf) == DISPATCH_BACK: File "/usr/lib/anaconda/yuminstall.py", line 1585, in doInstall rc = self.ayum.run(self.instLog, cb, anaconda.intf, anaconda.id) File "/usr/lib/anaconda/backend.py", line 291, in doInstall return anaconda.backend.doInstall(anaconda) File "/usr/lib/anaconda/dispatch.py", line 200, in moveStep rc = stepFunc(self.anaconda) File "/usr/lib/anaconda/dispatch.py", line 123, in gotoNext self.moveStep() File "/usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py", line 1195, in nextClicked self.anaconda.dispatch.gotoNext() File "/usr/lib/anaconda/iw/progress_gui.py", line 79, in renderCallback self.intf.icw.nextClicked() File "/usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py", line 1216, in handleRenderCallback self.currentWindow.renderCallback() IntegrityError: trans_data_pkgs.tid may not be NULL
Created attachment 413881 [details] Attached traceback automatically from anaconda.
this is occurring on F12 with anaconda? Are you using an updates image of some kind?
When the installation process is completed, it is occuring on F12 with anaconda. No, I'm not using an updates image of some kind.
Note: The same problem exists in rhel 6 beta too.
added acpi=off nodma=ide nomodeset nosmp kernel parameter, but nothing changed.
Is this just happening on a single machine? What do you mean it happens after "the installation process is completed"? If the above traceback is to be believed then in this code: res = executeSQL(cur, """INSERT INTO trans_beg (timestamp, rpmdb_version, loginuid) VALUES (?, ?, ?)""", (int(time.time()), str(rpmdb_version), yum.misc.getloginuid())) self._tid = cur.lastrowid ...is cur.lastrowid is None. This seems to be out of spec. and the only reference I can see is to a 4 year old bug report (that was fixed by a newer sqlite). Although in F-12 (and RHEL-6 beta) we don't check if "cur" is None (but that should give a different traceback). If it possible for you to add debugging print statements?
This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 12. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '12'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Fedora 12 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-12-02. Fedora 12 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.