Bug 592260 - [abrt] crash in totem-2.28.5-1.fc12: Process /usr/bin/totem was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
[abrt] crash in totem-2.28.5-1.fc12: Process /usr/bin/totem was killed by sig...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 540495
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: totem (Show other bugs)
12
i686 Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Bastien Nocera
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
abrt_hash:b72d041db5c2bf6dc04037f1229...
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-05-14 07:37 EDT by Abdellatif EL Filali
Modified: 2010-05-25 05:18 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 05:18:10 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (68.29 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-14 07:38 EDT, Abdellatif EL Filali
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Abdellatif EL Filali 2010-05-14 07:37:47 EDT
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: totem '/media/DAE20CBFE20CA23D/Users/0wner/Documents/Ma musique/Tracy chapman/EFJW.mp3'
comment: nothing special...just trying to UP the sound while i'm trying to pass to the next clip...that's all
component: totem
executable: /usr/bin/totem
global_uuid: b72d041db5c2bf6dc04037f1229a39c031a3030b
kernel: 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
package: totem-2.28.5-1.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/totem was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

How to reproduce
-----
1.try to UP the volume + pass to the next clip many times..
2.
3.
Comment 1 Abdellatif EL Filali 2010-05-14 07:38:44 EDT
Created attachment 414022 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:18:10 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 540495 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:18:10 EDT
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #540495.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.