Bug 592428 – [-r|--resizefs] and [-n|--nofsck] are not documented in the lvextend man page

Bug 592428 - [-r|--resizefs] and [-n|--nofsck] are not documented in the lvextend man page

Summary:	[-r\|--resizefs] and [-n\|--nofsck] are not documented in the lvextend man page

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	lvm2 (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	5.5
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Zdenek Kabelac
QA Contact:	Corey Marthaler
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:	592429
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2010-05-14 16:23 EDT by Corey Marthaler
Modified:	2011-01-13 17:41 EST (History)
CC List:	7 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:	lvm2-2.02.73-1.el5
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	592429 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-01-13 17:41:41 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Corey Marthaler 2010-05-14 16:23:09 EDT

Description of problem:
Need to add the following options:

        [-n|--nofsck]
        [-r|--resizefs]

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lvm2-2.02.56-8.el5_5.4

Comment 1 Zdenek Kabelac 2010-06-17 08:27:00 EDT

Fixed upstream in version 2.02.68:

https://www.redhat.com/archives/lvm-devel/2010-June/msg00053.html

Comment 2 Milan Broz 2010-08-30 06:39:47 EDT

Fix in lvm2-2.02.73-1.el5.

Comment 4 Corey Marthaler 2010-10-18 12:45:09 EDT

Fix verified in lvm2-2.02.74-1.el5.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2011-01-13 17:41:41 EST

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0052.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.