Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 592445
Review Request: maven-pmd-plugin - Maven PMD Plugin
Last modified: 2010-05-18 16:46:23 EDT
Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-pmd-plugin.spec
SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-pmd-plugin-2.5-1.fc13.src.rpm
Description: A Maven plugin for the PMD toolkit, that produces a report on both code rule violations and detected copy and paste fragments, as well as being able to fail the build based on these metrics.
Note about this package:
It built successfully in koji with dist-f14-maven221 target: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2188813
Needs an epoch of 1 for the Provides statement.
bash $ rpmlint maven-pmd-plugin.spec
maven-pmd-plugin.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: maven-pmd-plugin-2.5.tar.xz
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
bash $ rpmlint maven-pmd-plugin-2.5-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
maven-pmd-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation
maven-pmd-plugin.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/maven-pmd-plugin
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings
bash $ rpmlint maven-pmd-plugin-javadoc-2.5-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Actually, on reflection, the epoch is not needed since the new version is higher than the old 2.0.8. The other comments can be ignored. The source tarball info is provided and the non-conffile message is extraneous.
New Package CVS Request
Package Name: maven-pmd-plugin
Short Description: Maven PMD Plugin
BTW once an epoch is introduced it always needs to be there. so you do need it in the provides otherwise the old package will be seen as newer
Dennis, this is not true because it has the correct epoch in the obsoletes thus it don't need it in the package itself.
package A without epoch can obsolete package B with epoch: 5 as long as the epoch of package B is used in the package A obsolete
P.S. Trust me I've checked that with a big number of packages
Fixed. Build in koji: