Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 59264

Summary:	Conflicts with db1
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide	Reporter:	Need Real Name <sam>
Component:	gnome-libs	Assignee:	Havoc Pennington <hp>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	1.0	CC:	notting
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2002-02-05 16:40:00 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Need Real Name 2002-02-04 08:56:04 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Q312461)

Description of problem:
gnome-libs and gnome-libs-devel conflict with db1 
package, /usr/bin/db1_dump185, /usr/lib/libdb1.so.2 and /usr/lib/libdb1.a

Surely db1 should either be required, or superceded, or the conflicting files 
should have different names if they are special to that gnome-libs build.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try and install gnome-libs-1.4.1.2.90-9 and gnome-libs-devel-1.4.1.2.90-9 on 
a system with db1 installed
2.
3.
	

Actual Results:  Fails of course with rpm conflict reported

Expected Results:  Should have succeeded

Additional info:

Comment 1 Havoc Pennington 2002-02-04 16:05:50 UTC

I was advised not to Obsoletes: db1 for now, I'm not sure of the rationale.

The files can't be renamed since that would change the libgnomeui ABI.

Comment 2 Need Real Name 2002-02-05 15:35:05 UTC

What about the ABI of things using db1 if we force the install, or lets compare 
breaking the abi to not being able to install it at all.

It's a rawhide build, lets break the abi of libgnomeui and stick a few >= in 
the requires lines.

If I haven't grasped something, please let me know.

Comment 3 Havoc Pennington 2002-02-05 16:39:54 UTC

Yes, we can't break the ABI. It being rawhide isn't relevant, rawhide gets
released eventually.

You shouldn't need the db1 package, is the idea. i.e. remove it.

Comment 4 Havoc Pennington 2002-02-26 19:55:15 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 58942 ***

Comment 5 Need Real Name 2002-02-27 08:28:28 UTC

In that case can we at least have "Conflicts: db1" in the spec files.