Bug 592704 - [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.30.1-3.fc13: raise: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
[abrt] crash in nautilus-2.30.1-3.fc13: raise: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was ...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 591740
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: nautilus (Show other bugs)
i686 Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Tomáš Bžatek
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2010-05-16 07:43 EDT by Ulrich Hobelmann
Modified: 2015-03-03 17:48 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-11-08 12:31:01 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (26.50 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-16 07:43 EDT, Ulrich Hobelmann
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Ulrich Hobelmann 2010-05-16 07:43:56 EDT
abrt 1.1.0 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: nautilus
component: nautilus
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus
global_uuid: 48b00638e11bcc4237c9a3610e1fe5886c2b27f1
package: nautilus-2.30.1-3.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

(Nautilus in browser mode, F13 defaults)
1. I was navigating around a mounted MP3 player.
2. I opened my music directory from the "Places" menu.
3. At this point, nautilus crashed, probably some race condition. The machine is a Netbook (="slow"), so that makes race conditions all the more likely.
Comment 1 Ulrich Hobelmann 2010-05-16 07:43:59 EDT
Created attachment 414343 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 12:31:01 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 591740 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 12:31:01 EST
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #591740.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.