Bug 592779 - [abrt] crash in rhythmbox-0.12.6-5.fc12: Process /usr/bin/rhythmbox was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in rhythmbox-0.12.6-5.fc12: Process /usr/bin/rhythmbox was kille...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 590402
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: rhythmbox   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 12
Hardware: x86_64 Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bastien Nocera
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:e17acc17853dd4cdd1354789e87...
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-16 21:12 UTC by Valentine Ther
Modified: 2010-05-25 09:02 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 09:02:02 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (64.49 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-16 21:12 UTC, Valentine Ther 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Valentine Ther 2010-05-16 21:12:13 UTC 
abrt 1.0.8 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: rhythmbox
comment: Just crashed while listening to music, The only odd thing I can think of is that I had a very very long uptime, during which rhythmbox kept playing almost non stop.
component: rhythmbox
executable: /usr/bin/rhythmbox
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.x86_64
package: rhythmbox-0.12.6-5.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/rhythmbox was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)
Comment 1 Valentine Ther 2010-05-16 21:12:16 UTC 
Created attachment 414416 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:02:02 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 590402 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:02:02 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #590402.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.