Bug 592915 - interface probe fails
Summary: interface probe fails
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: openscap (Show other bugs)
(Show other bugs)
Version: 14
Hardware: All Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Peter Vrabec
QA Contact: Ondrej Moriš
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2010-05-17 10:52 UTC by Ondrej Moriš
Modified: 2010-12-08 10:43 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-12-08 10:43:57 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Testing content. (2.46 KB, text/xml)
2010-05-17 11:18 UTC, Ondrej Moriš
no flags Details

Description Ondrej Moriš 2010-05-17 10:52:34 UTC
Description of problem:

Currently it is impossible to evaluate OVAL content containing interface objects because function oval_syschar_model_probe_objects() returns non-zero integer.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

rawhide (commit 040b186bd2933e416e168c403319d2d98e199710)

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:

1. use tests/OVAL/probes/test_probes.c to evaluate attached content
Actual results:

OVAL/probes/test_probes.c:40 (main): Assumption `oval_syschar_model_probe_objects(sys_model) == 0' not fulfilled!
Aborted (core dumped)

Expected results:

Evaluation succeeded.

Additional info:

This is regression probably since evaluation proceeded without abortion before this commit (but the results were incorrect).

Comment 1 Ondrej Moriš 2010-05-17 11:18:36 UTC
Created attachment 414522 [details]
Testing content.

Comment 2 Ondrej Moriš 2010-05-20 12:26:38 UTC
Unfortunately problem is still present in commit 97cf2470d92ebb1e7c765e6252c17f95048fcf0d.

Comment 3 Bug Zapper 2010-07-30 11:39:06 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 14 development cycle.
Changing version to '14'.

More information and reason for this action is here:

Comment 4 Ondrej Moriš 2010-12-08 10:43:57 UTC
It works fine now (commit 479f3508f231df91b59a6a3ab558345ec769d0df).

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.