Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 593161 - [abrt] crash in lmms-0.4.6-2.fc12: QMetaObject::removeGuard: Process /usr/bin/lmms was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
[abrt] crash in lmms-0.4.6-2.fc12: QMetaObject::removeGuard: Process /usr/bin...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 591591
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: lmms (Show other bugs)
i686 Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Thomas Moschny
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2010-05-17 22:34 EDT by prower2000
Modified: 2010-05-25 05:46 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 05:46:46 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (54.62 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-17 22:34 EDT, prower2000
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description prower2000 2010-05-17 22:34:11 EDT
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/bin/lmms
comment: - have only seen it happen so far when playing notes on the "preview keyboard" for the TripleOscillator
component: lmms
crash_function: QMetaObject::removeGuard
executable: /usr/bin/lmms
global_uuid: 0ca02404edb81416739a31be446fc34dc322586d
package: lmms-0.4.6-2.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/lmms was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

How to reproduce
I was unable to reliably reproduce this bug, crash seems to occur at random during use
Comment 1 prower2000 2010-05-17 22:34:13 EDT
Created attachment 414707 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:46:46 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 591591 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:46:46 EDT
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #591591.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.