Bug 593241 - RFE - Online LUN expansion not mentioned
Summary: RFE - Online LUN expansion not mentioned
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Online_Storage_Reconfiguration_Guide
Version: 5.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Don Domingo
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-18 09:52 UTC by Arnold Sutter
Modified: 2010-07-13 23:13 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-07-13 23:13:21 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Arnold Sutter 2010-05-18 09:52:24 UTC
Description of problem:
Some Storage Arrays support the Online LUN expansion feature (for example HP EVA in a FC SAN Environment with Q-Logic and Emulex HBA's). 

Unfortunately, this feature is not mentioned in the current Online Storage Reconfiguration Guide.

Question: is this feature supported with the current RHEL update release and if yes, why is it not documented in the above guide?

There is at least one other bugzilla Entry on this subject (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450992) that requesting the same feature. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL V5.5


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Please document this feature if Oline LUN expansion it is indeed supported by RHEL 5.

Comment 1 Don Domingo 2010-05-18 22:37:17 UTC
Thanks Arnold. I'll get this documented as soon as I can confirm whether it's supported for any specific RHEL minor updates.

Comment 4 Arnold Sutter 2010-05-24 19:33:39 UTC
Hi all, 

the link from Rob indeed points to the documetation of online resizing an FC LUN. - I must have overlooked it, sorry about that!

While I'm not sure wether the rescan has to be done on all physical paths, I think it dosn't have adverse effects either. 

Thanks much for your speedy reply & best Regards, 

Arnold

Comment 5 Rob Evers 2010-05-24 19:58:43 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Hi all, 
> 
> the link from Rob indeed points to the documetation of online resizing an FC
> LUN. - I must have overlooked it, sorry about that!
> 
> While I'm not sure wether the rescan has to be done on all physical paths, I
> think it dosn't have adverse effects either. 
> 

Hi Arnold,

The documentation indicates that each device needs to be re-scanned in section 14.1 under the 'important' message.

I hope this is helpful.

Thanks, Rob

Comment 6 Arnold Sutter 2010-05-24 20:03:14 UTC
Hi Rob, 

great! - I think you may close this "NOTABUG". 

Thanks & Regards, 

Arnold


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.