Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 593753 - [abrt] crash in firefox-3.5.9-2.fc12: Process /usr/lib64/firefox-3.5/firefox was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
[abrt] crash in firefox-3.5.9-2.fc12: Process /usr/lib64/firefox-3.5/firefox ...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 587891
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: firefox (Show other bugs)
12
x86_64 Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Gecko Maintainer
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
abrt_hash:26002ffe093167f2b7ddae1e3ba...
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-05-19 12:07 EDT by vcmota78
Modified: 2010-05-25 04:25 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 04:25:34 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (76.77 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-19 12:07 EDT, vcmota78
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description vcmota78 2010-05-19 12:07:05 EDT
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.5/firefox
component: firefox
crash_function: nsProfileLock::FatalSignalHandler
executable: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.5/firefox
global_uuid: 26002ffe093167f2b7ddae1e3ba9dfe60d4e2351
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.x86_64
package: firefox-3.5.9-2.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/lib64/firefox-3.5/firefox was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)
Comment 1 vcmota78 2010-05-19 12:07:09 EDT
Created attachment 415181 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 04:25:34 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 587891 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 04:25:34 EDT
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #587891.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.