Bug 59408 – build failure because of wrong INCLUDED

Bug 59408 - build failure because of wrong INCLUDED

Summary:	build failure because of wrong INCLUDED

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification:	Retired
Component:	pam (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	1.0
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity high
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Nalin Dahyabhai
QA Contact:	Aaron Brown
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2002-02-07 06:18 EST by MATSUURA Takanori
Modified:	2007-04-18 12:39 EDT (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2002-02-07 06:18:33 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description MATSUURA Takanori 2002-02-07 06:18:28 EST

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8+) Gecko/20020203

Description of problem:
pam cannot build because of wrong INCLUDED.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. build stage

Actual Results:  INCLUDED=${topdir}/include

Expected Results:  INCLUDED=${topdir}/include/pwdb

Additional info:

In source files, pwdb header files are included as:
#include <pwdb/pwdb_public.h>

So header files from pwdb are installed to ${topdir}/include/pwdb not to
${topdir}/include.

BTW, Why pwdb is included with pam SRPM? Now the version of pwdb package is 0.61.2.
# But no header files are included in pwdb package now. :-(
# Why?

Comment 1 Nalin Dahyabhai 2002-03-07 19:11:49 EST

The pwdb maintainer has moved on to other packages, and requested that pwdb be
removed from the distribution.  For the moment, we're attempting to continue
building pam_pwdb to keep existing configurations from breaking, but it will be
fixed in 0.75-27.  Thanks!

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.