Bug 594572 - [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12: raise: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Summary: [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12: raise: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was ...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 539441
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: nautilus   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 12
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tomáš Bžatek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:8a64324b42118b0e60cff7eeca1...
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-21 03:56 UTC by Bruce-Robert Pocock
Modified: 2015-03-03 22:48 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 09:42:47 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (60.06 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-21 03:57 UTC, Bruce-Robert Pocock 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Bruce-Robert Pocock 2010-05-21 03:56:59 UTC 
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: nautilus --sm-client-id 1037b63b5a501fa077127199088495763400000218320035 --sm-client-state-file /home/brpocock/.config/session-state/nautilus-1272426753.state
component: nautilus
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus
global_uuid: 8a64324b42118b0e60cff7eeca1f0adea6d6b6ab
kernel: 2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64
package: nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)
Comment 1 Bruce-Robert Pocock 2010-05-21 03:57:00 UTC 
Created attachment 415565 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:42:47 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 539441 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:42:47 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #539441.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.