Bug 594887 - Installation fails with RHEL6.0-20100521.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 on dell pet610
Installation fails with RHEL6.0-20100521.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 on dell pet610
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: anaconda (Show other bugs)
6.0
x86_64 Linux
high Severity high
: rc
: 6.0
Assigned To: Anaconda Maintenance Team
Release Test Team
:
Depends On:
Blocks: 594856
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-05-21 17:10 EDT by Shyam Iyer
Modified: 2015-04-28 00:18 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: anaconda-13.21.45-1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 00:06:41 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Traceback during installation failure (22.84 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-24 15:16 EDT, Shyam Iyer
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Shyam Iyer 2010-05-21 17:10:56 EDT
Description of problem:
Installation fails with RHEL6.0-20100521.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 on dell-pet610-01.lab.bos.redhat.com

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL6.0-20100521.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64

How reproducible:
-Always
-Could reproduce it with RHEL6 Snapshot4 as well.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install RHEL6.0-20100521.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 dell-pet610-01.lab.bos.redhat.com
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Installation fails with traceback

Expected results:
Installation should pass

Additional info:
Comment 2 Chris Lumens 2010-05-21 17:46:55 EDT
And what's the traceback?
Comment 3 Marizol Martinez 2010-05-22 12:30:31 EDT
Shyam -- Since you may be unavailable for part of next week, please contact/engage someone else that can provide prompt feedback on behalf of Dell. Thanks!
Comment 4 RHEL Product and Program Management 2010-05-22 12:36:16 EDT
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux major release.  Product Management has requested further
review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Major release.  This request is not yet committed for
inclusion.
Comment 5 Shyam Iyer 2010-05-24 15:16:08 EDT
Created attachment 416201 [details]
Traceback during installation failure
Comment 6 Chris Lumens 2010-05-24 15:26:08 EDT
All I see is:

Traceback (most recent call last):
                                    File "/usr/bin/anaconda", line 1013, in <module>
                                                                                        anaconda.id = instClass.installDataClass(anaconda, extraModules, opts.display_mode, anac)
                                                                                                                                                                                _

and then it stairsteps off the screen.  Can you please attach the complete traceback?  That's in /tmp/anaconda-tb-* if you are able to get to tty2.
Comment 7 Shyam Iyer 2010-05-24 17:04:36 EDT
(In reply to comment #6)
> All I see is:
> 
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>                                     File "/usr/bin/anaconda", line 1013, in
> <module>
>                                                                                
>         anaconda.id = instClass.installDataClass(anaconda, extraModules,
> opts.display_mode, anac)
>                                                                                
>                                                                                
>                 _
> 
> and then it stairsteps off the screen.  Can you please attach the complete
> traceback?  That's in /tmp/anaconda-tb-* if you are able to get to tty2.    

Is there a way to get to tty2 through console/conserver to get the logs from /tmp/anaconda-tb*.. ?
Comment 8 Shyam Iyer 2010-05-24 17:31:10 EDT
I couldn't reproduce this with RHEL6.0-20100524.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64
Comment 9 Chris Lumens 2010-05-24 17:51:45 EDT
Are you comfortable with closing this as CURRENTRELEASE, then, or should we try to get more data first?
Comment 10 Shyam Iyer 2010-05-24 18:11:12 EDT
Thats ok with me as I have already tested that a couple of times with RHEL6.0-20100524.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 and once with Snapshot4 and it seems to go through..

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.