Bug 594887 - Installation fails with RHEL6.0-20100521.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 on dell pet610
Summary: Installation fails with RHEL6.0-20100521.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 on dell pet610
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: anaconda   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 6.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: 6.0
Assignee: Anaconda Maintenance Team
QA Contact: Release Test Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks: 594856
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-21 21:10 UTC by Shyam Iyer
Modified: 2015-04-28 04:18 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: anaconda-13.21.45-1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 04:06:41 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Traceback during installation failure (22.84 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-24 19:16 UTC, Shyam Iyer
no flags Details

Description Shyam Iyer 2010-05-21 21:10:56 UTC
Description of problem:
Installation fails with RHEL6.0-20100521.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 on dell-pet610-01.lab.bos.redhat.com

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL6.0-20100521.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64

How reproducible:
-Always
-Could reproduce it with RHEL6 Snapshot4 as well.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install RHEL6.0-20100521.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 dell-pet610-01.lab.bos.redhat.com
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Installation fails with traceback

Expected results:
Installation should pass

Additional info:

Comment 2 Chris Lumens 2010-05-21 21:46:55 UTC
And what's the traceback?

Comment 3 Marizol Martinez 2010-05-22 16:30:31 UTC
Shyam -- Since you may be unavailable for part of next week, please contact/engage someone else that can provide prompt feedback on behalf of Dell. Thanks!

Comment 4 RHEL Product and Program Management 2010-05-22 16:36:16 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux major release.  Product Management has requested further
review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Major release.  This request is not yet committed for
inclusion.

Comment 5 Shyam Iyer 2010-05-24 19:16:08 UTC
Created attachment 416201 [details]
Traceback during installation failure

Comment 6 Chris Lumens 2010-05-24 19:26:08 UTC
All I see is:

Traceback (most recent call last):
                                    File "/usr/bin/anaconda", line 1013, in <module>
                                                                                        anaconda.id = instClass.installDataClass(anaconda, extraModules, opts.display_mode, anac)
                                                                                                                                                                                _

and then it stairsteps off the screen.  Can you please attach the complete traceback?  That's in /tmp/anaconda-tb-* if you are able to get to tty2.

Comment 7 Shyam Iyer 2010-05-24 21:04:36 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> All I see is:
> 
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>                                     File "/usr/bin/anaconda", line 1013, in
> <module>
>                                                                                
>         anaconda.id = instClass.installDataClass(anaconda, extraModules,
> opts.display_mode, anac)
>                                                                                
>                                                                                
>                 _
> 
> and then it stairsteps off the screen.  Can you please attach the complete
> traceback?  That's in /tmp/anaconda-tb-* if you are able to get to tty2.    

Is there a way to get to tty2 through console/conserver to get the logs from /tmp/anaconda-tb*.. ?

Comment 8 Shyam Iyer 2010-05-24 21:31:10 UTC
I couldn't reproduce this with RHEL6.0-20100524.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64

Comment 9 Chris Lumens 2010-05-24 21:51:45 UTC
Are you comfortable with closing this as CURRENTRELEASE, then, or should we try to get more data first?

Comment 10 Shyam Iyer 2010-05-24 22:11:12 UTC
Thats ok with me as I have already tested that a couple of times with RHEL6.0-20100524.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 and once with Snapshot4 and it seems to go through..


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.