Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 594887
Installation fails with RHEL6.0-20100521.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 on dell pet610
Last modified: 2015-04-28 00:18:42 EDT
Description of problem:
Installation fails with RHEL6.0-20100521.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 on dell-pet610-01.lab.bos.redhat.com
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
-Could reproduce it with RHEL6 Snapshot4 as well.
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install RHEL6.0-20100521.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 dell-pet610-01.lab.bos.redhat.com
Installation fails with traceback
Installation should pass
And what's the traceback?
Shyam -- Since you may be unavailable for part of next week, please contact/engage someone else that can provide prompt feedback on behalf of Dell. Thanks!
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux major release. Product Management has requested further
review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Major release. This request is not yet committed for
Created attachment 416201 [details]
Traceback during installation failure
All I see is:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/anaconda", line 1013, in <module>
anaconda.id = instClass.installDataClass(anaconda, extraModules, opts.display_mode, anac)
and then it stairsteps off the screen. Can you please attach the complete traceback? That's in /tmp/anaconda-tb-* if you are able to get to tty2.
(In reply to comment #6)
> All I see is:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/anaconda", line 1013, in
> anaconda.id = instClass.installDataClass(anaconda, extraModules,
> opts.display_mode, anac)
> and then it stairsteps off the screen. Can you please attach the complete
> traceback? That's in /tmp/anaconda-tb-* if you are able to get to tty2.
Is there a way to get to tty2 through console/conserver to get the logs from /tmp/anaconda-tb*.. ?
I couldn't reproduce this with RHEL6.0-20100524.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64
Are you comfortable with closing this as CURRENTRELEASE, then, or should we try to get more data first?
Thats ok with me as I have already tested that a couple of times with RHEL6.0-20100524.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 and once with Snapshot4 and it seems to go through..