Hide Forgot
Description of problem: Installation fails with RHEL6.0-20100521.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 on dell-pet610-01.lab.bos.redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): RHEL6.0-20100521.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 How reproducible: -Always -Could reproduce it with RHEL6 Snapshot4 as well. Steps to Reproduce: 1.Install RHEL6.0-20100521.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 dell-pet610-01.lab.bos.redhat.com 2. 3. Actual results: Installation fails with traceback Expected results: Installation should pass Additional info:
And what's the traceback?
Shyam -- Since you may be unavailable for part of next week, please contact/engage someone else that can provide prompt feedback on behalf of Dell. Thanks!
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux major release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Major release. This request is not yet committed for inclusion.
Created attachment 416201 [details] Traceback during installation failure
All I see is: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/anaconda", line 1013, in <module> anaconda.id = instClass.installDataClass(anaconda, extraModules, opts.display_mode, anac) _ and then it stairsteps off the screen. Can you please attach the complete traceback? That's in /tmp/anaconda-tb-* if you are able to get to tty2.
(In reply to comment #6) > All I see is: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/anaconda", line 1013, in > <module> > > anaconda.id = instClass.installDataClass(anaconda, extraModules, > opts.display_mode, anac) > > > _ > > and then it stairsteps off the screen. Can you please attach the complete > traceback? That's in /tmp/anaconda-tb-* if you are able to get to tty2. Is there a way to get to tty2 through console/conserver to get the logs from /tmp/anaconda-tb*.. ?
I couldn't reproduce this with RHEL6.0-20100524.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64
Are you comfortable with closing this as CURRENTRELEASE, then, or should we try to get more data first?
Thats ok with me as I have already tested that a couple of times with RHEL6.0-20100524.n.0_nfs-Server-x86_64 and once with Snapshot4 and it seems to go through..