Bug 595077 - [abrt] crash in gvfs-archive-1.6.1-3.fc13: raise: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-archive was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
[abrt] crash in gvfs-archive-1.6.1-3.fc13: raise: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 585665
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gvfs (Show other bugs)
13
x86_64 Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Tomáš Bžatek
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
abrt_hash:4777ab8bce66c66208917acf8b7...
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-05-23 05:55 EDT by D.S. Ljungmark
Modified: 2015-03-03 17:48 EST (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 06:42:44 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (11.72 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-23 05:55 EDT, D.S. Ljungmark
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description D.S. Ljungmark 2010-05-23 05:55:07 EDT
abrt 1.1.0 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-archive file=/home/spider/Downloads/browser/Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso
component: gvfs
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-archive
global_uuid: 4777ab8bce66c66208917acf8b79ac0b1e6c39ea
kernel: 2.6.33.4-95.fc13.x86_64
package: gvfs-archive-1.6.1-3.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-archive was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
1. on FC 13, run "gnome-open Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso" from a commandline
2.
3.
Comment 1 D.S. Ljungmark 2010-05-23 05:55:09 EDT
Created attachment 415936 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 06:42:44 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 585665 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 06:42:44 EDT
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #585665.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.