Bugzilla (bugzilla.redhat.com) will be under maintenance for infrastructure upgrades and will not be unavailable on July 31st between 12:30 AM - 05:30 AM UTC. We appreciate your understanding and patience. You can follow status.redhat.com for details.
Bug 595161 - [abrt] crash in kdebase-runtime-4.4.2-3.fc12: ref: Process /usr/bin/nepomukservicestub was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in kdebase-runtime-4.4.2-3.fc12: ref: Process /usr/bin/nepomukse...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 575333
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kdebase-runtime
Version: 12
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Than Ngo
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:12865ad9d4886b5904294197112...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-23 17:53 UTC by Artem
Modified: 2010-05-25 10:31 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 10:31:48 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (23.61 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-23 17:53 UTC, Artem 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Artem 2010-05-23 17:53:06 UTC 
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/bin/nepomukservicestub nepomukstorage
component: kdebase-runtime
crash_function: ref
executable: /usr/bin/nepomukservicestub
global_uuid: 12865ad9d4886b59042941971121cfe34cd8028b
kernel: 2.6.32.12-115.fc12.x86_64
package: kdebase-runtime-4.4.2-3.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nepomukservicestub was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)
Comment 1 Artem 2010-05-23 17:53:08 UTC 
Created attachment 415984 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 10:31:48 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 575333 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 10:31:48 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #575333.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.