Bug 59590 - RFE: proposal for speeding up CD-ROM installs
Summary: RFE: proposal for speeding up CD-ROM installs
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: anaconda
Version: 7.3
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michael Fulbright
QA Contact: Mike McLean
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-02-10 22:15 UTC by Chris Ricker
Modified: 2007-03-27 03:51 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-03-07 19:59:39 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Chris Ricker 2002-02-10 22:15:19 UTC
When doing a CD-ROM install, package installation works something like this (I'm
basing this on the system sounds alone -- I'll go poke the anaconda source in a
minute to see what's *really* happening ;-):

1.  CD-ROM spins up, hard drive is idle
2.  package is transferred to hard drive from CD-ROM
3.  CD-ROM spins down
4.  package is installed

(3 and 4 are more-or-less simultaneous)

Since modern fast CD-ROMs take a long time to spin up and down, the end result
is that a lot of time is wasted....

If anaconda transferred multiple packages at once from CD-ROM and staged them
temporarily, CD install would be faster

Comment 1 Michael Fulbright 2002-02-11 15:53:45 UTC
Matt any idea on how to keep the drive motor running?

Comment 2 Matt Wilson 2002-02-11 17:52:58 UTC
Other distros have done a "while /bin/true; read from /dev/cdrom > /dev/null;
done" for this...


Comment 3 Michael Fulbright 2002-03-26 17:30:58 UTC
Deferring to future release.

Comment 4 Chris Ricker 2002-06-06 04:09:05 UTC
Now that it's new release time I'm reopening this (note:  I've not yet gotten to
try an install.  If the new beta is already doing this, then please close it
appropriately)

Comment 5 Michael Fulbright 2003-03-07 19:59:39 UTC
We have not had any further complaints about CDROM installs so I do not judge
this change is necessary.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.