Bug 596345 - smb.conf SELINUX documentation error
Summary: smb.conf SELINUX documentation error
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: samba   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Guenther Deschner
QA Contact: Ales Zelinka
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On: 587271
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-26 16:02 UTC by Dmitri Pal
Modified: 2011-05-19 13:14 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: samba-3.5.4-71.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 587271
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 13:14:13 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:0582 normal SHIPPED_LIVE samba bug fix and enhancement update 2011-05-19 09:37:35 UTC

Description Dmitri Pal 2010-05-26 16:02:47 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #587271 +++

Description of problem:
In the SELINUX NOTES in the main config file of smb.conf from samba and samba3x package, there is an mistake.
"If you create a new directory .... mark it as "samba-share_t". That is wrong, correct is "samba_share_t".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
samba and samba3x package

How reproducible:
Install samba or samba3x

Steps to Reproduce:
1. 
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:
"samba_share_t"

Additional info:

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 13:14:13 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0582.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.