Bug 597498 - [abrt] crash in gnome-panel-2.30.0-1.fc13: raise: Process /usr/bin/gnome-panel was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Summary: [abrt] crash in gnome-panel-2.30.0-1.fc13: raise: Process /usr/bin/gnome-pane...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 595584
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnome-panel
Version: 13
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ray Strode [halfline]
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:e36377806ca62021e409591446a...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-29 08:19 UTC by weinandt
Modified: 2010-11-08 17:46 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-08 17:46:46 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (36.64 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-29 08:19 UTC, weinandt 		no flags Details
View All

Description weinandt 2010-05-29 08:19:48 UTC 
abrt 1.1.0 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: gnome-panel
component: gnome-panel
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/bin/gnome-panel
global_uuid: e36377806ca62021e409591446ab22f0381f75b7
kernel: 2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686.PAE
package: gnome-panel-2.30.0-1.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/gnome-panel was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

comment
-----
1. Hibernate
2. close lid
3. open lid
4. had to "hard reset" to recover
5. had to delete the panel config of gnome in the users homedir

How to reproduce
-----
1. offensichtlich ein Problem nach Hibernate und "aufwecken" daraus - das Problem war bei mir nicht reproduzierbar
2.
3.
Comment 1 weinandt 2010-05-29 08:19:50 UTC 
Created attachment 417823 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Jeff Raber 2010-11-06 06:01:04 UTC 
Seems similar to (but not the same as) bug 597281.



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 17:46:46 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 595584 ***
Comment 4 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 17:46:46 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #595584.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.