Bug 597725 - Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the browser
Review Request: mozilla-svg-edit - A complete vector graphics editor in the ...
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
: 597721 597722 597726 597729 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-05-30 06:01 EDT by Raghunath
Modified: 2011-01-10 18:35 EST (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-10 18:35:00 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Raghunath 2010-05-30 06:01:22 EDT
Spec URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/mozilla-svg-edit.spec
SRPM URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm
Description:SVG-edit is a fast,web-based,Javascript-driven SVG editor that
works in any modern browser.

rpmlint mozilla-svg-edit.spec ../RPMS/noarch/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.noarch.rpm ../SRPMS/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm 
mozilla-svg-edit.noarch: W: no-documentation
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

koji Link : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2217850
Comment 1 Mohammed Imran 2010-05-30 09:33:07 EDT
*** Bug 597722 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Mohammed Imran 2010-05-30 09:36:08 EDT
*** Bug 597721 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Parag AN(पराग) 2010-05-30 23:05:19 EDT
*** Bug 597726 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Parag AN(पराग) 2010-05-30 23:05:23 EDT
*** Bug 597729 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Chen Lei 2010-05-31 02:24:05 EDT
I suggest you to send a mail to fedora-devel to discuss whether firefox entensions are worth to be included in fedora. 
Currently, very few firefox extensions are packaged and fedora don't have a guideline about this.
Comment 6 Till Maas 2010-09-08 18:14:24 EDT
(In reply to comment #5)
> I suggest you to send a mail to fedora-devel to discuss whether firefox
> entensions are worth to be included in fedora. 
> Currently, very few firefox extensions are packaged and fedora don't have a
> guideline about this.

It was not possible to package fedora extensions until recently afaik and they are valid packages. A guideline for the naming has recently passed:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-09-08/fedora-meeting.2010-09-08-16.01.log.html#l-67
Comment 7 Hicham HAOUARI 2010-11-28 08:49:13 EST
So you forces users to have the extension installed for both seamonkey and firefox. What the extension is broken for one application ? The user should remove it for both firefox and seamonkey.

As a suggestion, you can shorten the install section by creating an xpi then unpacking it to the desired location.
Comment 8 Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-06 10:38:14 EST
It doesn't look like the original submitter has participated in any of the discussion in this ticket.  Raghunath, did you still wish to submit this package?
Comment 9 Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-10 18:35:00 EST
No response; closing.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.