Spec URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/mozilla-svg-edit.spec SRPM URL:http://github.com/downloads/raghunath/fedora/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description:SVG-edit is a fast,web-based,Javascript-driven SVG editor that works in any modern browser. rpmlint mozilla-svg-edit.spec ../RPMS/noarch/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.noarch.rpm ../SRPMS/mozilla-svg-edit-2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm mozilla-svg-edit.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. koji Link : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2217850
*** Bug 597722 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 597721 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 597726 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 597729 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I suggest you to send a mail to fedora-devel to discuss whether firefox entensions are worth to be included in fedora. Currently, very few firefox extensions are packaged and fedora don't have a guideline about this.
(In reply to comment #5) > I suggest you to send a mail to fedora-devel to discuss whether firefox > entensions are worth to be included in fedora. > Currently, very few firefox extensions are packaged and fedora don't have a > guideline about this. It was not possible to package fedora extensions until recently afaik and they are valid packages. A guideline for the naming has recently passed: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-09-08/fedora-meeting.2010-09-08-16.01.log.html#l-67
So you forces users to have the extension installed for both seamonkey and firefox. What the extension is broken for one application ? The user should remove it for both firefox and seamonkey. As a suggestion, you can shorten the install section by creating an xpi then unpacking it to the desired location.
It doesn't look like the original submitter has participated in any of the discussion in this ticket. Raghunath, did you still wish to submit this package?
No response; closing.