Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 598828
Revision history formatting is difficult to read
Last modified: 2010-11-23 23:17:38 EST
Description of problem:
The formatting of the revision history makes it difficult to read. I would be nice to have them layed out with a bit more whitespace.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Screenshots attached of current & a proposal using the html format as the example.
Created attachment 418929 [details]
current appearance in html
Created attachment 418930 [details]
Created attachment 422739 [details]
My take on the revision history layout
Here is my take on what would look better, let me know what you think.
I would still like to have the horizontal line under the rev#/date/author, but that is just a personal aesthetics I think.
I would be quite happy with that layout.
(In reply to comment #3)
> Here is my take on what would look better, let me know what you think.
Looks good to me :)
Darrin -- the horizontal line under the rev/date/author looks confusing to me; I need to look twice to work out which description goes with which rev/date/author line; ie, is the rev/date/author line a header or a footer for the change described? I would need a bigger, thicker line to separate the revisions in that case.
Reformated PDF and HTML revision history.
Fixed in build: 1.6.3-0.t101
Confirmed fixed in 2.1