Bug 601839 - [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.30.1-3.fc13: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
[abrt] crash in nautilus-2.30.1-3.fc13: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed ...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 626207
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: nautilus (Show other bugs)
13
i686 Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Tomáš Bžatek
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
abrt_hash:20422859fe3ba136cba64040e78...
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-06-08 14:11 EDT by Manuel Chagas
Modified: 2015-03-03 17:49 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 10:31:20 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (33.90 KB, text/plain)
2010-06-08 14:11 EDT, Manuel Chagas
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Manuel Chagas 2010-06-08 14:11:23 EDT
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: nautilus
comment: Cleaning photos in digital camera. Note: had just updated some packages and hadn't restarted the computer.
component: nautilus
crash_function: nautilus_file_peek_display_name
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus
global_uuid: 20422859fe3ba136cba64040e78f1fcad3131bfe
kernel: 2.6.33.5-112.fc13.i686
package: nautilus-2.30.1-3.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
1. Select list of files in digital camera (more than 100)
2. Delete files
Comment 1 Manuel Chagas 2010-06-08 14:11:26 EDT
Created attachment 422299 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 10:31:20 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 626207 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 10:31:20 EST
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #626207.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.