Bug 602064 - Review Request: ledger - Command-line double-entry accounting system
Summary: Review Request: ledger - Command-line double-entry accounting system
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 478613
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-06-09 04:44 UTC by Ed Marshall
Modified: 2010-06-09 12:37 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-06-09 07:16:48 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ed Marshall 2010-06-09 04:44:52 UTC
Spec URL: http://esm.logic.net/public/fedora/ledger/ledger.spec
SRPM URL: http://esm.logic.net/public/fedora/ledger/ledger-2.6.2-1.fc13.src.rpm
Description:
Ledger is a powerful, double-entry accounting system that is accessed from the UNIX command-line.

----

Please be kind, this is my first package submission to Fedora, and I'm in need of a sponsor.

Three additions besides what is in upstream have been added: a compilation fix for gcc 4.4 (added independently, but I later learned it was in the Ubuntu package), a man page (from Ubuntu), and a patch for the info page to make it UTF-8 (also from Ubuntu).

At this point, rpmlint seems happy with everything except for the executable bits on the scripts directory under /usr/share/doc/ledger-2.6.2/scripts; as they're actually working examples of how to write scripts for ledger reporting, it seemed appropriate that they retain execute permission, but I can remove it if that's a deal-breaker.

The only other complaint was the lack of documentation in the -devel and emacs packages; that seemed to be common enough in other packages I looked at, though.

Suggestions and criticism would be greatly appreciated, and I'll be happy to follow-up with revisions. Thanks!

Comment 1 Shakthi Kannan 2010-06-09 05:12:22 UTC
This is a duplicate of? 

 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478613

Comment 2 Randy Berry 2010-06-09 07:16:48 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 478613 ***

Comment 3 Ed Marshall 2010-06-09 12:37:13 UTC
Ack! You're absolutely right, I didn't see that my initial searching. :( Sorry for the noise.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.