Bug 602064 - Review Request: ledger - Command-line double-entry accounting system
Review Request: ledger - Command-line double-entry accounting system
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 478613
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-06-09 00:44 EDT by Ed Marshall
Modified: 2010-06-09 08:37 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-06-09 03:16:48 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Ed Marshall 2010-06-09 00:44:52 EDT
Spec URL: http://esm.logic.net/public/fedora/ledger/ledger.spec
SRPM URL: http://esm.logic.net/public/fedora/ledger/ledger-2.6.2-1.fc13.src.rpm
Description:
Ledger is a powerful, double-entry accounting system that is accessed from the UNIX command-line.

----

Please be kind, this is my first package submission to Fedora, and I'm in need of a sponsor.

Three additions besides what is in upstream have been added: a compilation fix for gcc 4.4 (added independently, but I later learned it was in the Ubuntu package), a man page (from Ubuntu), and a patch for the info page to make it UTF-8 (also from Ubuntu).

At this point, rpmlint seems happy with everything except for the executable bits on the scripts directory under /usr/share/doc/ledger-2.6.2/scripts; as they're actually working examples of how to write scripts for ledger reporting, it seemed appropriate that they retain execute permission, but I can remove it if that's a deal-breaker.

The only other complaint was the lack of documentation in the -devel and emacs packages; that seemed to be common enough in other packages I looked at, though.

Suggestions and criticism would be greatly appreciated, and I'll be happy to follow-up with revisions. Thanks!
Comment 1 Shakthi Kannan 2010-06-09 01:12:22 EDT
This is a duplicate of? 

 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478613
Comment 2 Randall "Randy" Berry 2010-06-09 03:16:48 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 478613 ***
Comment 3 Ed Marshall 2010-06-09 08:37:13 EDT
Ack! You're absolutely right, I didn't see that my initial searching. :( Sorry for the noise.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.