Bug 602137 - [abrt] crash in evolution-data-server-2.30.1-2.fc13: __memcpy_ssse3: Process /usr/libexec/e-calendar-factory was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in evolution-data-server-2.30.1-2.fc13: __memcpy_ssse3: Process ...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 624801
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution-data-server   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 13
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:0b3e58af3914cb705c0d16fbcca...
Keywords: Desktop
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2010-06-09 08:44 UTC by Franta
Modified: 2010-11-08 17:20 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-11-08 17:20:56 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (77.36 KB, text/plain)
2010-06-09 08:45 UTC, Franta
no flags Details

Description Franta 2010-06-09 08:44:57 UTC
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/e-calendar-factory
comment: I did basically what I listed in the above list of steps. Open the client, found an event invitation in the mail - I clicked on the Accept invitation button and the Calendar crashed.
component: evolution-data-server
crash_function: __memcpy_ssse3
executable: /usr/libexec/e-calendar-factory
global_uuid: 0b3e58af3914cb705c0d16fbcca2b72f8ff475a7
package: evolution-data-server-2.30.1-2.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/e-calendar-factory was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
1. Open the mail client
2. Look up event/calendar invitation in the inbox
3. Click on ACCEPT/DECLINE button - this instantly causes calendar to crash

Comment 1 Franta 2010-06-09 08:45:00 UTC
Created attachment 422475 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 17:20:56 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 624801 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 17:20:56 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #624801.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.