Description of problem: $SUBJECT says it all. How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create an alert on some resource that executes an operation on another resource 2. Set up the server/agent/the underlying resource so that that operation fails when invoked 3. Trigger the alert Actual results: The history entry for the alert report success, while the operation history on the target resource reports operation failure. Expected results: The alert should report the failure along with the detailed information about the operation failure. Additional info: For the always failing operation, I started the agent as an unprivileged user and set up the alert to start an apache server. That always fails unless the agent runs with enough privileges.
commit 894b6792a5f614d63b10703a726a29e4aab603e0 Author: Joseph Marques <joseph> Date: Wed Jun 30 03:26:37 2010 -0400 BZ-602123: BZ-602270: various tweaks for alert notification processing * never allow any exceptions to bubble up during notification processing * add new UNKNOWN status for AlertNotificationLogs ** use the UNKNOWN state to catching mishaving plugins during alert processing * add new DEFERRED status for AlertNotificationLogs ** use the DEFERRED state or operations ** since we don't wait for the operation to complete, we don't know it's termination state) * add new PARTIAL status for AlertNotificationLogs ** use it to represent mixed success/failures during email sending ** do not defer email sending anymore, execute during each notification processing ** by processing them all upfront, easier to reason about terminating ResultState
Direct Emails PARTIAL Target addresses were: [rhquser, ^&$*((@)#$.$@] Successfully sent to: [rhquser] Failed to send to: [^&$*((@)#$.$@] Resource Operations DEFERRED Executed 'Store Configuration' on the ( dhcp6-150.pnq.redhat.com-embedded > Tomcat (8080) ) resource Check the corresponding operation history for more details. Also, I did not see any exception in the logs. Marking this bug as verified.
Mass-closure of verified bugs against JON.