Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 60295

Summary: Webalizer configuration file error
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Louis Aslett <louis>
Component: webalizerAssignee: Than Ngo <than>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.2   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://mrtg.sixnet.net/webalizer/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-02-24 21:58:54 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Louis Aslett 2002-02-24 21:58:50 UTC 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686; en-US; 0.7) Gecko/20010316

Description of problem:
Webalizer does not work properly "out-of-the-box".  Since RedHat defaults to
rotating Apache log files weekly, Webalizer only records at most a week at a
time in the reports it produces.  The Webalizer log file (/etc/webalizer.conf)
should have the line:

#Incremental     no

Set to:

Incremental     yes

for default installs.

Obviously this bug report is useless for RH7.2, but perhaps the default
/etc/webalizer.conf file should be changed for the next RH release to work out
of the box with RedHat's other settings.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install webalizer RPM
2.Leave Webalizer to analyze an active apache for over a month



Actual Results:  Notice that you only ever see a running week for each month.

Expected Results:  The whole month should remain stored in the webalizer summary
format, because it should be using the webalizer.current incremental file to
store the month-so-far info in.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Than Ngo 2002-02-25 12:15:15 UTC 
it's fixed in 2.01_09-5. Thanks for your reports.
Comment 2 Mark J. Cox 2002-12-04 08:33:39 UTC 
An errata has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. 
This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen 
this bug report if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2002-254.html