Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-caTools.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-caTools-1.10-3.fc13.src.rpm Description: Contains several basic utility functions including: moving (rolling, running) window statistic functions, read/write for GIF and ENVI binary files, fast calculation of AUC, LogitBoost classifier, base64 encoder/decoder, round-off error free sum and cumsum, etc.
*** Bug 585817 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
The package is already reviewed by the submitter, spec file is petty file. rpmlint only showes some harmless warnings which can be ignored. rpmlint R-caTools-* R-caTools.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gif -> fig, gig, if R-caTools.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) roc -> cor, rock, Kroc R-caTools.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) auc -> aux, ac, arc R-caTools.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Tools: moving window statistics, gif, base64, roc auc... R-caTools.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cumsum -> cum sum, cum-sum, cums um License field matches the upstream license. The source used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. <<md5sum checksum>> 19c479fa167ffba886764c0059fc6824 This package is approved.
Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-caTools Short Description: Tools: moving window statistics, gif, base64, roc auc... Owners: pingou Branches: F-13 F-12 InitialCC:
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).
hm I can't build it since R-bitops is still in updates-testing. I have added a 'works for me' on koji, let's see if the maintainer reacts.
(In reply to comment #5) > hm I can't build it since R-bitops is still in updates-testing. > I have added a 'works for me' on koji, let's see if the maintainer reacts. Hi Pierre-YvesChibon, Why not request for a membership in provenpackager? Things will be easier if you can commit all R-related packages. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Provenpackager_policy
I actually asked once and got refused for valid reasons.
(In reply to comment #7) > I actually asked once and got refused for valid reasons. The policy is changed, now you just need 3 positive votes from existed sponsors to become a provenpackager. Is their any active provenpackgers in R SIG?
(In reply to comment #8) > Is their any active provenpackgers in R SIG? Spot is the R maintainer