Bug 603690 - proposed changes for Chapter 2. Securing Your Network
Summary: proposed changes for Chapter 2. Securing Your Network
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: doc-Security_Guide (Show other bugs)
(Show other bugs)
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Scott Radvan
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks: 547583
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-06-14 11:20 UTC by Karel Srot
Modified: 2015-04-07 03:19 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-06-14 22:30:17 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Karel Srot 2010-06-14 11:20:27 UTC
Description of problem:

After reading Chapter 2. Securing Your Network I have following two proposals:

1. Several topics mention files in /lib directory. Somewhere in the beginning of the book (1. Document Conventions???) there should be a statement saying that on 64-bit systems some files mentioned in the text may be located in /lib64 instead on /lib.

2. 2.1.4.3.1. The su Command
"5. Open the PAM configuration file for su (/etc/pam.d/su)..."
should not be included in the ordered list because it is confusing. According to the precedent text items in the list describe steps for the GUI alternative to
"usermod -G wheel <username>". Therefore the /etc/pam.d/su step (5th) should be excluded from the list since it is not related to the User Manager. Instead, "/etc/pam.d/su" part should be mentioned separately outside (after) the list.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Security Guide
A Guide to Securing Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Edition 1.5

Comment 1 RHEL Product and Program Management 2010-06-14 11:23:04 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux major release.  Product Management has requested further
review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Major release.  This request is not yet committed for
inclusion.

Comment 2 Scott Radvan 2010-06-14 22:30:17 UTC
fixed in source, will be available when next published -thanks!


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.