Summary: SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/swat "signal" access . Detailed Description: SELinux denied access requested by swat. It is not expected that this access is required by swat and this access may signal an intrusion attempt. It is also possible that the specific version or configuration of the application is causing it to require additional access. Allowing Access: You can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see FAQ (http://docs.fedoraproject.org/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385) Please file a bug report. Additional Information: Source Context unconfined_u:system_r:swat_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 Target Context unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1 023 Target Objects None [ process ] Source swat Source Path /usr/sbin/swat Port <Unknown> Host (removed) Source RPM Packages samba-swat-3.4.7-58.fc12 Target RPM Packages Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.6.32-116.fc12 Selinux Enabled True Policy Type targeted Enforcing Mode Enforcing Plugin Name catchall Host Name (removed) Platform Linux (removed) 2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686.PAE #1 SMP Fri May 28 04:47:04 UTC 2010 i686 i686 Alert Count 1 First Seen Sat 19 Jun 2010 02:30:40 PM EDT Last Seen Sat 19 Jun 2010 02:30:40 PM EDT Local ID 9bfd830b-862a-48bf-9d86-45efebf25a77 Line Numbers Raw Audit Messages node=(removed) type=AVC msg=audit(1276972240.401:39567): avc: denied { signal } for pid=27698 comm="swat" scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:swat_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=process node=(removed) type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1276972240.401:39567): arch=40000003 syscall=37 success=no exit=-13 a0=55db a1=f a2=b15ff4 a3=55db items=0 ppid=26823 pid=27698 auid=500 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=213 comm="swat" exe="/usr/sbin/swat" subj=unconfined_u:system_r:swat_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null) Hash String generated from catchall,swat,swat_t,unconfined_t,process,signal audit2allow suggests: #============= swat_t ============== allow swat_t unconfined_t:process signal;
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 605974 ***