Bug 60657 - php 3.0.18 doesn't seem to want to compile
Summary: php 3.0.18 doesn't seem to want to compile
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: php
Version: 6.2
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Phil Copeland
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-03-04 10:44 UTC by Bishop Clark
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:40 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-03-04 10:46:10 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
a log of the rebuild of the wgetted (wgotten?) SRPM (7.30 KB, text/plain)
2002-03-04 10:46 UTC, Bishop Clark
no flags Details

Description Bishop Clark 2002-03-04 10:44:50 UTC
Description of Problem:
ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.2/en/os/SRPMS/php-3.0.18-8.src.rpm is not 
rebuildable.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
php-3.0.18-8

How Reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm --rebuild ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.2/en/os/SRPMS/php-3.0.18-8.src.rpm
2. 
3. 

Actual Results:

checking for ASPELL support... no
checking for MCAL support... no
checking for ftp support... yes
./configure: line 7380: syntax error near unexpected token `else'
./configure: line 7380: `else'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.13893 (%build)


Expected Results:
I was kinda expecting happy messages about
Wrote:  /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/php-3.0.18-8.i386.rpm and such

Additional Information:
pretty standard stock RH62 system, except Apache uses recursive configs instead 
of 18,000 -D switches 8-)	Whaddaya wanna know?

Comment 1 Bishop Clark 2002-03-04 10:46:06 UTC
Created attachment 47300 [details]
a log of the rebuild of the wgetted (wgotten?) SRPM

Comment 2 Phil Copeland 2002-08-06 18:17:43 UTC
I'm working on an errata for this.

I unfortunately don't have a ship date as that depends on when the QA folk sign
off on the errata package

Phil
=--=

Comment 3 Bishop Clark 2002-08-06 18:25:52 UTC
Is there still the desire within Red Hat to provide updates for 6.2?  It's not
mentioned any more, and I've got a feeling it's a bit long in the tooth for TPTB
out there .. especially with RHL80 loomingon the horizon!

Give it to me straight, doc - is my 6.2 box dying of old age, and is it but a
matter of time before an OpenSSL exploit tips my hand and I put it out to pasture?






Comment 4 Phil Copeland 2002-08-06 18:29:36 UTC
Well 6.2 is supported,.. just from a devleoper point of view there's also
7.(0,1,2,3), HA1.0 and AS2.1 to maintain,.. it's a nightmarish load of work so
we're sort of snowed under. But 6.2 IS supported,.. but only till next March I
believe.

That said, you probably should jump to 7.3 (it's basically 7.2 + bugfixes)

Phil
=--=


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.