Bug 607012 - [abrt] crash in gnome-scan-0.6.2-5.fc13: gsj_build_pipeline: Process /usr/bin/flegita was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in gnome-scan-0.6.2-5.fc13: gsj_build_pipeline: Process /usr/bin...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 606159
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnome-scan   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 13
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Deji Akingunola
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:4db33c6c5723fb155bad43d1efd...
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-06-22 23:11 UTC by Ken Dubrick
Modified: 2010-11-09 12:54 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 12:54:12 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (98.01 KB, text/plain)
2010-06-22 23:12 UTC, Ken Dubrick 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Ken Dubrick 2010-06-22 23:11:30 UTC 
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: flegita
comment: open program and push scan
component: gnome-scan
crash_function: gsj_build_pipeline
executable: /usr/bin/flegita
global_uuid: 4db33c6c5723fb155bad43d1efd32596b31300d8
kernel: 2.6.33.5-124.fc13.i686
package: gnome-scan-0.6.2-5.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/flegita was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
1. just trying to scan a picture
2.
3.
Comment 1 Ken Dubrick 2010-06-22 23:12:15 UTC 
Created attachment 426108 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 12:54:12 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 606159 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 12:54:12 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #606159.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.