Bug 607243 - [abrt] crash in gvfs-archive-1.6.2-1.fc13: raise: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-archive was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Summary: [abrt] crash in gvfs-archive-1.6.2-1.fc13: raise: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 583258
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gvfs
Version: 13
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tomáš Bžatek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:4cacdda4998f716721f16681b6a...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-06-23 15:34 UTC by Nuno Anjos
Modified: 2015-03-03 22:50 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 13:17:03 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (10.70 KB, text/plain)
2010-06-23 15:34 UTC, Nuno Anjos 		no flags Details
View All

Description Nuno Anjos 2010-06-23 15:34:15 UTC 
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-archive file=/home/nanjos/Projects/ScriptRunner/ScriptRunner.tar.gz
comment: try to open tar.gz file, double click didn't work, open with shows 2 links to archive manager, one with icon another with no icon, the no icon gives this error.
component: gvfs
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-archive
global_uuid: 4cacdda4998f716721f16681b6a310470ef24978
kernel: 2.6.33.5-124.fc13.x86_64
package: gvfs-archive-1.6.2-1.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-archive was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
1. try to open tar.gz file
2.
3.
Comment 1 Nuno Anjos 2010-06-23 15:34:20 UTC 
Created attachment 426293 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 13:17:03 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 583258 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 13:17:03 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #583258.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.