Bug 607742 - [abrt] crash in gnome-scan-0.6.2-5.fc13: Process /usr/bin/flegita was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in gnome-scan-0.6.2-5.fc13: Process /usr/bin/flegita was killed ...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 606949
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnome-scan (Show other bugs)
(Show other bugs)
Version: 13
Hardware: i686 Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Deji Akingunola
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:699efc412e4265985f7e04d2476...
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-06-24 17:21 UTC by Ken Dubrick
Modified: 2010-11-09 16:34 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 16:34:59 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (35.55 KB, text/plain)
2010-06-24 17:21 UTC, Ken Dubrick
no flags Details

Description Ken Dubrick 2010-06-24 17:21:07 UTC
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: flegita
component: gnome-scan
crash_function: gsane_scanner_option_get_value@plt
executable: /usr/bin/flegita
global_uuid: 699efc412e4265985f7e04d247625e8d87078e40
kernel: 2.6.33.5-124.fc13.i686
package: gnome-scan-0.6.2-5.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/flegita was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

comment
-----
Epson Stylus CX3200 MFP.
Printer works...scanner doesn't

How to reproduce
-----
1. opened scan utility 
2. push scan
3.

Comment 1 Ken Dubrick 2010-06-24 17:21:09 UTC
Created attachment 426657 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 16:34:59 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 606949 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 16:34:59 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #606949.

Sorry for the inconvenience.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.