Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 61071

Summary: kickstart xconfig options ignored with multiple video cards
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Crutcher Dunnavant <crutcher+bugzilla>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Jeremy Katz <katzj>
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED QA Contact: Brock Organ <borgan>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.2   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-04-02 00:34:46 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Crutcher Dunnavant 2002-03-12 23:41:41 UTC
Description of Problem:

I have a machine with an on-board video card, and a pci video card.
Anaconda autodetects the on-board, but the bios hints for the pci
card to be used, and Xconfigurator detects the pci card.

The fun part is that anaconda ignores the card settings for 'xconfig'
in my kickstart file, and uses the on-board card. And the kickstart
line I am using comes directly from anaconda-ks.cfg, after manually
telling anaconda the correct settings.

The line in question:

xconfig --card "NVIDIA Riva TNT2 (generic)" --videoram 16384 --hsync 30.0-85.0
--vsync 48.0-120.0 --resolution 1024x768 --depth 16

Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2002-03-14 23:22:55 UTC
Anaconda and especially kickstart doesn't always cope well on machines with
multiple video adaptors and we don't have any machines in the building which
exhibit the problem, but there are some GX110s at NCSU with onboard i810 video
and an add-on nvidia card that I'll try to get over to look at

Comment 2 Crutcher Dunnavant 2002-03-15 01:02:06 UTC
Um, yep. They are in fact i810 onboard adapters. The systems are from Dell.
Sorry for leaving that bit out.

But, if it's given an _explicit_ switch, why should it even try probing?

Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2002-03-15 01:24:28 UTC
Because it still does some degree of probing to find out how much crack you're
on and to make sure it can start X, but it's supposed to ignore its probe
results.  There's some weirdness with doing multiple probes in there though
that's probably fubar'ing things.

Comment 4 Michael Fulbright 2002-04-12 01:48:41 UTC
Deferring to a future release.