abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash. architecture: x86_64 Attached file: backtrace cmdline: gzip -d -c /usr/share/man/man1/ftp.1.gz component: gzip executable: /bin/gzip global_uuid: 47f7499094e9af53b95e1f6b9fec18ab6f76433c kernel: 2.6.33.5-124.fc13.x86_64 package: gzip-1.3.13-4.fc13 rating: 4 reason: Process /bin/gzip was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard) How to reproduce ----- 1. Ran ltrace -S -f man ftp
Created attachment 429635 [details] File: backtrace
Reproduced also on Fedora 12, gzip-1.3.12-15.fc12.i686.
gzip crashes only when man running under ltrace executes it, and ltrace option -f is present (to trace child processes). It seems to be a ltrace issue. On my Fedora 12 machine 'ltrace -S -f man ftp' crashes in gzip's _start(), before its code gets executed: Core was generated by `gzip -d -c /usr/share/man/man1/ftp.1.gz'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x08048ff8 in _start () Thread 1 (Thread 12771): #0 0x08048ff8 in _start () No symbol table info available. From To Syms Read Shared Object Library 0x007bf990 0x008cb8a0 Yes (*) /lib/libc-2.11.2.so 0x00787830 0x0079ecdf Yes (*) /lib/ld-2.11.2.so (*): Shared library is missing debugging information. $1 = 0x0 No symbol "__glib_assert_msg" in current context. eax 0x7a68e0 8022240 ecx 0x7a0030 7995440 edx 0x795d10 7953680 ebx 0x7a5fc4 8019908 esp 0x7a0030 0x7a0030 ebp 0x0 0x0 esi 0x4 4 edi 0x8048ff0 134516720 eip 0x8048ff8 0x8048ff8 <_start+8> eflags 0x10206 [ PF IF RF ] cs 0x73 115 ss 0x7b 123 ds 0x7b 123 es 0x7b 123 fs 0x0 0 gs 0x33 51 Dump of assembler code for function _start: 0x08048ff0 <_start+0>: xor %ebp,%ebp 0x08048ff2 <_start+2>: pop %esi 0x08048ff3 <_start+3>: mov %ecx,%esp 0x08048ff5 <_start+5>: and $0xfffffff0,%esp 0x08048ff8 <_start+8>: push %eax 0x08048ff9 <_start+9>: push %esp 0x08048ffa <_start+10>: push %edx 0x08048ffb <_start+11>: push $0x8053680 0x08049000 <_start+16>: push $0xcc053690 0x08049005 <_start+21>: push %ecx 0x08049006 <_start+22>: push %esi 0x08049007 <_start+23>: push $0x804d220 0x0804900c <_start+28>: call 0x8048d24 <__libc_start_main@plt> 0x08049011 <_start+33>: hlt 0x08049012 <_start+34>: nop 0x08049013 <_start+35>: nop 0x08049014 <_start+36>: int3 0x08049015 <_start+37>: nop 0x08049016 <_start+38>: nop 0x08049017 <_start+39>: nop 0x08049018 <_start+40>: nop 0x08049019 <_start+41>: nop 0x0804901a <_start+42>: nop 0x0804901b <_start+43>: nop 0x0804901c <_start+44>: nop 0x0804901d <_start+45>: nop 0x0804901e <_start+46>: nop 0x0804901f <_start+47>: nop End of assembler dump.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 13. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '13'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 13's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 13 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Fedora 13 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2011-06-25. Fedora 13 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.