Bug 611841 - [abrt] crash in evince-2.30.3-1.fc13: Process /usr/bin/evince was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
[abrt] crash in evince-2.30.3-1.fc13: Process /usr/bin/evince was killed by s...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 605949
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evince (Show other bugs)
x86_64 Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Marek Kašík
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2010-07-06 12:07 EDT by Theophanis Kontogiannis
Modified: 2010-11-09 11:01 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 11:01:16 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (50.25 KB, text/plain)
2010-07-06 12:07 EDT, Theophanis Kontogiannis
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Theophanis Kontogiannis 2010-07-06 12:07:43 EDT
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: evince '/home/tkonto/Desktop/\xce\x9a\xce\xac\xcf\x84\xce\xbf\xce\xb9\xce\xba\xce\xbf\xce\xb9 \xce\xb1\xcf\x80\xcf\x8c \xcf\x84\xce\xbf 1960 \xcf\x87\xcf\x89\xcf\x81\xce\xaf\xcf\x82  \xce\xba\xce\xb9\xce\xbd\xce\xb7\xcf\x84\xcf\x8c.pdf'
comment: I canceled the print spooling of a 127 pages pdf, before letting it finish.
component: evince
crash_function: _cairo_meta_surface_replay_internal
executable: /usr/bin/evince
global_uuid: db671b88e1c3b8eaf0b4fae58154ad8435ffc342
package: evince-2.30.3-1.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/evince was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
1. start printing a big pdf (100 pages)
2. cancel printing in the middle
Comment 1 Theophanis Kontogiannis 2010-07-06 12:07:46 EDT
Created attachment 429820 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 11:01:16 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 605949 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 11:01:16 EST
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #605949.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.