Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/teal.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/teal-1_40b-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Teal is a C++ multithreaded library to verify verilog designs. It deals with such things as simulation logging, error reporting, threading, memory model management. It basically provides all the low level building blocks needed to start a verification environment.
$ rpmlint teal.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint teal-1_40b-1.fc13.src.rpm teal.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multithreaded -> multitudinous, multitude, multicolored teal.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US verilog -> verily, Verizon, veritably 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint teal-1_40b-1.fc13.i686.rpm teal.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multithreaded -> multitudinous, multitude, multicolored teal.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US verilog -> verily, Verizon, veritably 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Successful Koji builds for F-12, F-13, F-14, EL-5 and EL-6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2302879 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2302881 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2302880 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2302891 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2302884 Upstream has agreed to use their software under LGPLv2+.
This package is a bit problematic and should be fixed in upstream before adding it to fedora. Look the file name libteal.ivl.so - a shlib without a proper soname is useless.
- Added patch for versioned shared library inclusion. - Moved shared libraries to _libdir. - Moved examples to -devel subpackage. - Added ldconfig post, postun invocation. SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/teal.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/teal-1_40b-2.fc14.src.rpm
$ rpmlint teal.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint teal-1_40b-2.fc14.i686.rpm teal.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multithreaded -> multitudinous, multitude, multicolored teal.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US verilog -> verily, Verizon, veritably 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint teal-devel-1_40b-2.fc14.i686.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint teal-1_40b-2.fc14.src.rpm teal.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multithreaded -> multitudinous, multitude, multicolored teal.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US verilog -> verily, Verizon, veritably 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Shakthi, eliminate the -devel package and move its contents to the main teal. Those so-called developement files would be used by the user. Hence no need to separate them. - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. Please fix this last item, then teal will be approved :)
I have removed the -devel package, and moved all contents to the base package, as this package itself is a development tool. SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/teal.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/teal-1_40b-3.fc14.src.rpm Koji builds are fine. $ rpmlint teal.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint teal-1_40b-3.fc14.i686.rpm teal.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multithreaded -> multitudinous, multitude, multicolored teal.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US verilog -> verily, Verizon, veritably teal.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libteal.ivl.so teal.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/teal/teal_vmemory.h teal.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/teal/teal_vout.h teal.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/teal/teal_dictionary.h teal.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/teal/teal_reg.h teal.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/teal/teal_vthreads.h teal.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/teal/teal_vrandom.h teal.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/teal/teal.h teal.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/teal/teal_vevents.h 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings. $ rpmlint teal-1_40b-3.fc14.src.rpm teal.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multithreaded -> multitudinous, multitude, multicolored teal.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US verilog -> verily, Verizon, veritably 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Approved
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: teal Short Description: Verification Utility and Connection Library Owners: shakthimaan chitlesh Branches: F-12 F-13 F-14 EL-5 EL-6
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: teal Short Description: Verification Utility and Connection Library Owners: shakthimaan chitlesh Branches: F-12 F-13 EL-5 EL-6
GIT done (by process-cvs-requests.py). With f14 branch added.
teal-1_40b-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/teal-1_40b-3.fc13
teal-1_40b-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/teal-1_40b-3.fc12
teal-1_40b-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/teal-1_40b-3.el5
teal-1_40b-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/teal-1_40b-3.fc14
teal-1_40b-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update teal'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/teal-1_40b-3.el5
teal-1_40b-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
teal-1_40b-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
teal-1_40b-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
For some reason there is no teal component in Bugzilla so I'm setting fedora-cvs to ? and reporting this bug here: This package is not built with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, fix attached.
Created attachment 436669 [details] Build with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
Created attachment 436670 [details] Take #2, with fixed subject line
teal-1_40b-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/teal-1_40b-4.el5
teal-1_40b-4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/teal-1_40b-4.fc13
teal-1_40b-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/teal-1_40b-4.fc12
teal-1_40b-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/teal-1_40b-4.fc14
teal-1_40b-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
I don't see a scm request here. Can you add a template about what you need and reset the fedora-cvs flag?
The patch has been applied and teal-1_40b-4 has been pushed to the repositories.
(In reply to comment #27) > I don't see a scm request here. > > Can you add a template about what you need and reset the fedora-cvs flag? Kevin, please see comment 19. The package is in git and packagedb, but the Bugzilla components for it for both Fedora and EPEL are missing. In case you need the scm requests, they're in comments 8 and 9.
ok, should be fixed now. There was a package with no short description causing problems for the sync script. ;(
teal-1_40b-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
teal-1_40b-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
teal-1_40b-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.