Bug 613879 - Review Request: fillmore-lombard - audio and video editors for GNOME
Summary: Review Request: fillmore-lombard - audio and video editors for GNOME
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Chen Lei
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-07-13 04:47 UTC by Matthias Clasen
Modified: 2010-07-29 13:36 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-07-21 01:44:43 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
supercyper1: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Chen Lei 2010-07-13 09:14:10 UTC
Initial comments here:

1.rpmlint fill*rpm
fillmore.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multitrack -> multitask, multiracial, multitude
fillmore.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multitrack -> multitask, multiracial, multitude
fillmore.src: W: non-standard-group Unspecified
fillmore.src:33: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
fillmore.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean
fillmore.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
fillmore.src: W: no-%clean-section
fillmore.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multitrack -> multitask, multiracial, multitude
fillmore.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multitrack -> multitask, multiracial, multitude
fillmore.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Unspecified
fillmore.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fillmore
fillmore.x86_64: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/fillmore.desktop value "application/fillmore;text/yorba-media" for string list key "MimeType" in group "Desktop Entry" does not have a semicolon (';') as trailing character
fillmore-lombard.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Unspecified
fillmore-lombard.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lombard
fillmore-lombard.x86_64: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/lombard.desktop value "application/lombard;text/yorba-media" for string list key "MimeType" in group "Desktop Entry" does not have a semicolon (';') as trailing character
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 13 warnings.

invalid-desktopfile errors and non-standard-group Unspecified warnings should be fixed.

2. Missing mimeinfo scripts in spec

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo

3. Package name don't match naming guideline:
fillmore can be renamed to fillmore-lombard, then create to two independent subpackages, fillmore and lombard are two seperate softwares.
 
%package -n fillmore
%package -n lombard

4. Spec don't honor compiler flags(%{optflags}) correctly

From koji log:
cc -c `pkg-config --cflags gee-1.0 gdk-x11-2.0 gstreamer-0.10 gstreamer-base-0.10 gstreamer-controller-0.10 gstreamer-interfaces-0.10 gstreamer-pbutils-0.10 gtk+-2.0` -I../../vapi -D_VERSION='"0.1.0"' -D_PREFIX='"/usr"' -O2 -g -pipe -fPIC -o marina/ui_clip.o marina/ui_clip.c

Comment 2 Matthias Clasen 2010-07-13 17:10:02 UTC
Not sure the independent subpackages are really better, but here you go:

http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/fillmore-lombard.spec
http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/fillmore-lombard-0.1.0-2.fc14.src.rpm

Comment 3 Chen Lei 2010-07-14 09:05:21 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Not sure the independent subpackages are really better, but here you go:
> http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/fillmore-lombard.spec
> http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/fillmore-lombard-0.1.0-2.fc14.src.rpm    

It seems like fillmore and lombard are seperate softwares, lombard is not a subpackage of fillmore and the vice versa, so I think use fillmore and lombard for rpm name will be better.

review here
+:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing

MUST Items:
[-] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package.
[=] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [FIXME?: covers this
list and more]
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
<<md5sum checksum>>ac2d7d1549f7230853b3539bcd362eb8
[-] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one supported architecture.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro.
[+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just
symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in
%post and %postun.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is
described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be
removed in the spec.
[+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

Some minor issue here:

1.%package fillmore should be changed to %package -n fillmore,  so that we can use fillmore as a binary rpm name. %package lombard should be changed to %package -n lombard also.

2. All Subpackages need to add Group:          Applications/Multimedia to avoid non-standard-group Unspecified warnings in rpmlint.


3. koji build on x86_64 is failed now(i686 is fine).
See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2318335

Comment 5 Chen Lei 2010-07-15 14:33:31 UTC
Okay, the package is approved.

Comment 6 Matthias Clasen 2010-07-15 17:46:15 UTC
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: fillmore-lombard
Short Description: audio and video editors for GNOME
Owners: mclasen
Branches: 
InitialCC:

Comment 7 Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-16 17:40:03 UTC
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

Comment 8 Matthias Clasen 2010-07-21 01:44:43 UTC
built


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.