Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libXcm.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libXcm-0.2.6-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: X Color Management Library
rpmlint on installed package: # rpmlint libXcm libXcm.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libXcm.so.0.2.6 /usr/lib64/libXfixes.so.3 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [root@liet ~]# rpmlint libXcm-devel 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2320286
I am not an approved reviewer but spec looks good beside two uneeded dependency: graphviz & libGL-devel
Additional comment on spec: Maybe it's good to add : Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig * Naming is ok * spec file correctly named * Meets packaging guidelines * Meets Licensing Guidelines MIT * Does not install a desktop file, but should not (no program) * Does install manual pages
Taking for review. (In reply to comment #3) > Maybe it's good to add : > Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig > Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig No, this is not needed. rpm will automatically add deps on executables specified with "%post -p" or "%postun -p".
You have added doxygen and graphviz as BuildRequires to build docs, but the generated docs don't appear in the final rpms. Why? > %exclude %{_mandir}/man3/Xcm.3x.gz Please add a comment to the spec file why this file is removed. > %description > The library allows to attach color regions to windows for color management. Take a look at the included README file which has a slightly more elaborate description, perhaps you can use something from that. The installed /usr/include/X11/Xcm.h includes <X11/Xlib.h> and <X11/Xatom.h>, which means that the -devel package needs to depend on the packages which provide the headers: libX11-devel and xorg-x11-proto-devel. > %{_includedir}/* This glob also makes the package own /usr/include/X11/ directory, but it looks like that the convention so far has been to have xorg-x11-proto-devel own the dir and the rest of the libX*-devel packages just depend on xorg-x11-proto-devel. I would not suggest to depend on xorg-x11-proto-devel solely for /usr/include/X11 directory ownership, but since this package already gets pulled in to solve header deps, it's better for libXcm-devel to not own this dir. So, in summary, I'd suggest to add libX11-devel and xorg-x11-proto-devel to -devel Requires, and use %{_includedir}/X11/Xcm.h instead of the glob above. Please address the issues mentioned here and I'll evaluate the package for final approval.
Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libXcm.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libXcm-0.2.6-2.fc13.src.rpm Description: X Color Management Library Thx for the reviews.
Fedora review libXcm-0.2.6-2.fc13.src.rpm 2010-07-16 + OK ! needs attention rpmlint output: $ rpmlint libXcm \ libXcm-devel \ libXcm-0.2.6-2.fc13.src.rpm \ libXcm-debuginfo-0.2.6-2.fc14.i686.rpm libXcm.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US colour -> color, co lour, co-lour libXcm.i686: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libXcm.so.0.2.6 /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3 libXcm.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US colour -> color, co lour, co-lour 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. If you want to, you can change colour -> color (US spelling) before importing the package, but otherwise the warnings are harmless and can be ignored. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + Spec file name matches the base package name + The package follows the Packaging Guidelines + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The license field in the spec file matches the actual license + The package contains license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum: 96c1ee0c4f7f95dc448a0eb69b3929ae libXcm-0.2.6.tar.gz 96c1ee0c4f7f95dc448a0eb69b3929ae Download/libXcm-0.2.6.tar.gz + The package builds in koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane n/a The spec file MUST handle locales properly + ldconfig is properly called in %post and %postun + Package does not bundle copies of system libraries n/a Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + Permissions are properly set and %files has %defattr + Consistent use of macros + The package must contain code, or permissable content. n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc don't affect the package + Header files are in -devel n/a Static libraries should be in -static + Library files that end in .so are in -devel package + -devel requires the fully versioned base + Package doesn't contain any libtool .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Directory ownership sane + Filenames are valid UTF-8 > Requires: xorg-x11-xtrans-devel ! Looks like you copy-pasted the wrong package name. Please change it to Requires: xorg-x11-proto-devel as it's the *proto* package that contains X11/Xatom.h, not *xtrans*. I trust that you fix this before importing the package. Besides that, the package looks good. APPROVED
Thx, fixed locally. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libXcm Short Description: X Color Management Library Owners: kwizart Branches: devel F-13 F-12 EL-6 InitialCC:
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).