Bug 615634 - [abrt] crash in evolution-data-server-2.30.2-2.fc13: __libc_free: Process /usr/libexec/e-calendar-factory was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in evolution-data-server-2.30.2-2.fc13: __libc_free: Process /us...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 611429
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution-data-server
Version: 13
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:5d16d7683321a10a596151e9e8c...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-07-17 16:14 UTC by Sanford Darlington
Modified: 2010-11-08 19:00 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-08 19:00:14 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (29.87 KB, text/plain)
2010-07-17 16:14 UTC, Sanford Darlington 		no flags Details
View All

Description Sanford Darlington 2010-07-17 16:14:47 UTC 
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/e-calendar-factory
comment: Just reading through my emails being careful not to reply or create a new email that might cause a crash in e-addressbook-factory.  I came across a meeting invite which automatically adds an event to my Exchange calendar and it crashes.
component: evolution-data-server
crash_function: __libc_free
executable: /usr/libexec/e-calendar-factory
global_uuid: 5d16d7683321a10a596151e9e8ca0e4145754273
kernel: 2.6.33.6-147.fc13.x86_64
package: evolution-data-server-2.30.2-2.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/e-calendar-factory was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
1. Open Evolution w/ Exchange options and start reading email.
2. Open up a meeting invitation.
3. Crash!
Comment 1 Sanford Darlington 2010-07-17 16:14:49 UTC 
Created attachment 432604 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 19:00:14 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 611429 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 19:00:14 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #611429.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.